Creating for FedRAMP Pays Again

Getting an software or service safety licensed underneath FedRAMP – the Federal Threat and Authorization Administration Program – is likely one of the hardest hurdles dev and ops groups can clear.

It’s so laborious, that of all of the enterprise providers that exist on this planet, solely 276 are FedRAMP licensed. However these are the apps that the U.S. authorities companies (just like the Departments of Justice, Commerce, and Training, and even some Division of Protection companies) can use, so constructing an app to this commonplace might be profitable. The U.S. Authorities generally is a worthwhile buyer.

It’s troublesome to take care of FedRAMP compliance when constructing a SaaS product, however making a DevOps course of on your dev and SRE (ops) groups collectively that permits them to stretch to FedRAMP might be value it. Sustaining FedRAMP compliance means creating merchandise with the best safety specs. The safety requirements of FedRAMP additionally embrace different strong safety requirements from NIST (Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Expertise) and FISMA (Federal Info Safety Modernization).

A handful of Cisco merchandise meet FedRAMP necessities and are listed within the FedRAMP catalog: Cisco WebEx, Cisco WebEx for Authorities, Cisco Unified Communications Supervisor Cloud for Authorities (Cisco UCM Cloud for Authorities), and Cisco Cloud Lock for Authorities. Different merchandise are within the audit course of.

To get a way of what it takes to fulfill the FedRAMP commonplace and the advantages and alternatives that come from incomes a FedRAMP ATO (Authorization to Function), I sat down with Charles Randall, a former teammate of mine and a safety knowledgeable at Cisco:

What was the most important problem your operations workforce wanted to fulfill with FedRAMP?

Charles Randall: Our largest problem was container vulnerability remediation, which was solely added to scope by the FedRAMP administration workplace the month our audit was scheduled. It was an unlimited change that pulled numerous open supply initiatives into scope, and even required some architectural adjustments. We’re nonetheless struggling to take care of the implications right now.

How would you describe the distinction in your software and operations safety posture earlier than and after beginning the FedRAMP certification course of?

CR: We began with a strong software safety posture; ok to cross ISO 27001/17 and SOC 2 requirements. FedRAMP calls for a considerably larger degree of operational safety, each technically and procedurally. Lots of the safety enhancements we made to realize FedRAMP compliance have been utilized to our business operations environments as effectively, guaranteeing world-class safety for our prospects and constant processes and procedures throughout groups.

What are the important thing components crucial for sustaining a strong ongoing monitoring technique? Would these methods make sense in a non-FedRAMP context?

CR: The important thing components of a strong monitoring program are completeness of imaginative and prescient and a strong set of KPIs. Completeness of imaginative and prescient contains full compliance and vulnerability scanning throughout your total asset stock, in addition to monitoring of software, system and community actions with a give attention to anomaly detection. These methods additionally make sense in non-FedRAMP context and have been almost universally utilized to our business working environments.

Do you employ off-the-shelf instruments to distinguish a safety occasion from a safety incident? Would you employ these instruments and strategy if qualifying for FedRAMP wasn’t the target?

CR: We’re primarily utilizing free open supply software program for safety occasion administration, complimented by the complete suite of AWS safety providers. Whereas we do anticipate rising adoption of machine studying, there may be actually no substitute for the experience of operators and analysts with eyes on logs, constantly refining monitoring to realize the best doable sign to noise ratio. That is one other case the place we use the identical tooling throughout FedRAMP and non-FedRAMP environments, as a result of it permits us to re-use the FedRAMP work in our business environments, and preserve consistency between working environments.

How do FedRAMP necessities have an effect on software builders? Does their safety posture enhance as a part of the audit course of?

CR: FedRAMP necessities have an unlimited affect on software improvement, in any respect ranges. Each determination, from system structure, to third-party part choice, all the way in which right down to your selection of cryptographic ciphers, can have vital penalties whereas pursuing or sustaining FedRAMP authorization. Past technical selections, FedRAMP controls additionally require mature software program improvement processes and configuration administration practices, with many necessities extending all the way in which to construct/deploy pipeline and developer laptops.

What are the implications of builders not adopting safety greatest practices early within the worth stream (as a part of their each day work)?

Failing to undertake safety greatest practices early in your product improvement cycle, or failing to combine these practices into each day routines, might be disastrous, no matter whether or not your group is trying to pursue FedRAMP authorization. It’s well-known that the price of fixing software program defects might be an order of magnitude larger or extra in manufacturing versus improvement section of the SDLC. Whereas that’s painful sufficient, if you issue within the potential prices of larger-scale redesigns that may be required as a consequence of safety defects, the prices of safety incidents, and the possibly catastrophic prices of a safety breach, the selection turns into clear that addressing safety calls for early and integrating it into everybody’s each day routine is the best choice. If that argument nonetheless just isn’t sufficient to influence you, think about that person information privateness rules are actually more and more enforced, and infrequently with monumental fines.

What would you suggest for builders who’re new to safe coding and want to stand up to hurry with greatest practices. Would you suggest coaching? Studying and adopting safety particular instruments?

All the above. Safe coding is simply….. coding.


Now learn:


We’d love to listen to what you suppose. Ask a query or go away a remark beneath.
And keep linked with Cisco DevNet on social!

LinkedIn | Twitter @CiscoDevNet | Fb | YouTube Channel


Leave a Reply