iRobot, SharkNinja patent dispute receives preliminary dedication


Hearken to this text

Voiced by Amazon Polly

iRobot’s Roomba Combo j7+ at its docking station. iRobot’s vacuum cleaners can autonomously cost themselves. | Supply: iRobot

Administrative Legislation Choose Maryann McNamara points an preliminary dedication in iRobot’s patent infringement lawsuit in opposition to SharkNinja. If the complete fee, which is predicted to make a judgment by February 2023, upholds Choose McNamara’s resolution, imports of SharkNinja’s infringing merchandise could possibly be banned. 

iRobot’s lawsuit concerned 4 of its patents, and Choose McNamara discovered that SharkNinja infringed upon two of them, U.S. Patent No. 9,884,423 (the ‘423 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 10,813,517 (the ‘517 patent). The courtroom discovered that SharkNinja didn’t violate the opposite two patents iRobot included in its preliminary submitting. 

The ‘423 patent includes it autonomous robotic auto-docking and vitality administration techniques and strategies. iRobot’s ‘517 patent is for its navigational management system for robotic gadgets. The corporate filed a grievance alleging SharkNinja infringed upon its patents with the Worldwide Commerce Fee (ITC) in January 2021. 

“This dedication validates the energy of iRobot’s patent portfolio and the laborious work of our engineers over the higher a part of the final 20 years,” Colin Angle, chairman and CEO of iRobot, mentioned. “We’re glad to see the ITC is holding SharkNinja accountable for its misappropriation of iRobot mental property. iRobot thanks ALJ McNamara and the ITC for his or her laborious work on this case.”

FREF banner

Because the grievance was filed, SharkNinja has redesigned its merchandise to keep away from any infringement. The preliminary dedication discovered that the corporate’s redesigned merchandise didn’t infringe upon any of the disputed iRobot patents. The corporate has begun manufacturing and promoting the redesigned merchandise, and plans to interchange all of its present merchandise with the redesigned ones if the fee upholds its ruling. 

iRobot’s grievance is the second time the corporate has asserted a lawsuit in opposition to SharkNinja. In 2019, iRobot filed a movement for a preliminary injunction within the District of Massachusetts to cease gross sales and distribution of the Shark IQ Robotic. That case is on maintain for associated proceedings on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Workplace. 

In August, Amazon introduced that it will be buying iRobot for $1.7 billion, increasing the corporate’s already in depth robotics ecosystem. Amazon will purchase iRobot for $61 per share in an all-cash transaction, together with iRobot’s internet debt. Completion of the transaction is topic to customary closing situations. On completion, Colin Angle will stay as CEO of iRobot.

The FTC has began an antitrust investigation into Amazon’s plans to accumulate iRobot. The FTC’s investigation will reportedly give attention to whether or not the information offered by iRobot’s Roomba robotic vacuum offers Amazon an unfair benefit within the retail business. The investigation may even reportedly take a look at how the road of robotic vacuums would slot in with Amazon’s current sensible house merchandise, like Ring and Alexa.


Leave a Reply